Main

October 13, 2007

The Fairness Doctrine

What sort of Supreme Court gives “We the People” power more effectively?  Is it a court that, on looking at laws made at our insistence under the umbrella of a founding law may find them wrongheaded and set them right?  Or is it a court that, though they may disagree with the philosophy guiding those laws, permits poorly conceived ideas to run their course as long as they do not violate the letter of that founding law?  These are questions I never heard in my education or in public before the demise of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine

Continue reading "The Fairness Doctrine" »

September 19, 2007

Healthcare Open Letter to Kevin Brady

Healthcare is such a big issue these days it is difficult to realize most of the people writing about it really are not touched by the consequences of the morass of the medical marketplace.  I am.  The ridiculous expense of medical insurance forced me out of the policy I was carrying for myself and my four children last month. (And, as of this writing I have not received a promised refund from World Insurance.)  What follows is a letter I wrote to my Congressman, Kevin Brady, on this issue.  It reflects some of my philosophy on the medical marketplace and what I thinkg government's role is in that marketplace.

Continue reading "Healthcare Open Letter to Kevin Brady" »

May 02, 2007

Culture, Marriage, and Sex for Fun

In my last entry I made a brief foray into a discussion of marriage.  After a discussion of the subject with my grown son on the same day it seems appropriate to expand on that a little.

You may recall I stated that marriage should not be considered a social environment for sexual relationships.  Well, this is news to a lot of people.

Continue reading "Culture, Marriage, and Sex for Fun" »

April 19, 2007

The Death Eaters

Yesterday the Supreme Court, in a narrowly drawn 5 to 4 decision, upheld a 2003 federal law outlawing partial birth abortions.

Predictably this was both hailed and derided as an attack on Roe v. Wade.  Should it turn out to be so so much the better but, in point of fact, it simply accepts human revulsion at the torture killing of any animal, human or not. 

Continue reading "The Death Eaters" »

April 12, 2007

Is Somebody Listening?

Lee Emmerich Jamison

To say I'm mad at the Republican party is like saying I may find a use for air today.  Recently I sent them an e-mail in response to one of their shill-o-grams telling the party as much. 

Suprise!, Suprise!, I got a response. 

It's not much, but I share it with you below, along with the e-mail that prompted it.

Continue reading "Is Somebody Listening?" »

April 10, 2007

The Spirit of the Game

Lee Emmerich Jamison



A friend let me borrow a book on baseball written by philosophers.  It is remarkable how fascinating thinking people find the game of baseball.   In one chapter in particular a philosopher addressed the issue of the "spirit of the game" as it applied to umpiring.  He then implied a connection to the philosophy of law.  

Upon some reflection there is good reason why we should not want philosophers deciding how judges umpire the game of life.

Continue reading "The Spirit of the Game" »

April 06, 2007

Freedom's Anchor

Lee Emmerich Jamison

Freedom.  What does that word mean to you?  Is it just doing what you please, or is there something deeper to it?  I think it means having a grasp of both what I must respect in others and what others must respect in me.  One can't be free if one has no regard for the needs and concerns of others.  Why?  Because that disregard will lead to the harm of others.  Then their self defense will close off even one's otherwise harmless options.  One also can't be free if the larger society, particularly the government, can disregard one's own needs and concerns.  The need side of that equation is obvious.  Fail to fill true needs and a person sickens and/or dies.  But governments do not exist over needs. Tribes fill those just fine.  Governments exist because of concerns, the reduction of anxiety, the desire to know one's place in the world, to be assured that there will be order in society, and the sense that one's efforts will be to one's own credit.  In large societies failure to meet the challenge of these concerns results in a cultural paralysis.  That is, by definition, a loss of freedom.

Continue reading "Freedom's Anchor" »

April 05, 2007

Running Against Washington

Lee Emmerich Jamison

It is popular for politicians running for national office to run against Washington.  Remember Jimmy Carter?  Yeah, like that.

We prove over and over that the American people, at best, dislike Washington.  At worst we would push it into the Atlantic and start over.  Well, while you ponder how someone like Barak Obama can run against the power structure on which he stands, why not think seriously about how to reduce the influence of a city the inhabitants of which have a serious claim to owning the country.

Continue reading "Running Against Washington" »

March 23, 2007

The Dismal Science

Lee Emmerich Jamison

Mark Twain said that there were..."lies, damned lies, and statistics." Oh, that his wit could have been applied to some of the modern world's notions of the sciences. When I was a student at Centenary College of Louisiana Economics was "the dismal science". "Political Science" was a punch line. Both statements remain true today. Unfortunately society has since been indoctrinated to speaking these course names with a straight face.

Continue reading "The Dismal Science" »

March 16, 2007

Diseducation and Congress

I would put this in the humor category, but then, it's really not that funny.  Media bigotry has never been more in evidence in the coverage of recent American politics than it is in the current flap over the firing of a handful of federal prosecutors by the Bush administration.  Democrats in charge in Congress and their flagrant allies in the news media are out to use these firings as a whip to drive Karl Rove out of office.

Do these people have a leg to stand on?

No.

Continue reading "Diseducation and Congress" »

March 06, 2007

The Libby Travesty

Well, it's over. 

The result of a ridiculous trial after a fraudulent witchhunt investigation is that a man freely acknowledged by every person directly involved in the publication of the identity of Valerie Plame for NOT having been the source of the leak, INCLUDING THE ACTUAL LEAKER, has been convicted for crimes for which he would never have been investigated if Washington D.C. were run by anything other than power-mad mafiosi.

Patrick Fitzgerald, who would be under indictment himself for pursuing a fraudulent investigation and for official oppression in a sane world, gets political cover and the chance to prosper.

Scooter Libby loses his standing in the world and goes to jail.

It is a dark, dark time in America.  And this?  This is only the beginning.

March 05, 2007

Sorcerers in Dark Robes

Lee Emmerich Jamison

In Shakespeare's "MacBeth" the play opens with a scene in which the "weird sisters", darkly robed witches in beards, ruminate over their cauldron of magic. In the process they take the fate of a kingdom out of the hands of men and kings to play caprice on the flawed soul of the title character. Of course we know today such things never happen, don't we?

Well, don't we?

Continue reading "Sorcerers in Dark Robes" »

February 28, 2007

More on Border Bungles

Following up on Border Bungles from a few weeks ago. I have posted a question on my website homepage. "Is the Bush Administration involved in an effort (the original wording was 'criminal conspiracy') to cripple border enforcement?" It is an intentionally inflammatory question.

See: http://www.pardontheagents.com/ and: http://www.firesociety.com/article/10263/?src=105

Continue reading "More on Border Bungles" »

February 23, 2007

On "Christian" Leaders

Lee Emmerich Jamison

Austin columnist Dave McNeely, writing on the relative Christianity of our national leaders a couple of years ago, really pulled my chain. More recent efforts by Texas Governor Rick Perry to force the mechanisms of government to pursue his personal vision of medical beneficence have further highlighted this issue.  The notion that truly Christian leaders would not restrain or even reduce government spending on programs aimed at relief for the "poor" and "under-privileged" is so flawed and is such a staple of misguided liberal rhetoric that it cannot go unaddressed.

Continue reading "On "Christian" Leaders" »

February 15, 2007

The Limits of Power

1

Lee Emmerich Jamison

Thought I'd recycle something from last fall to remind Republicans who think their constituency is among the Washington press for whom they REALLY work.

Partly out of frustration many of us have been sending our elected officials angry reminders that the former Republican majorities were elected by people who pay attention to what our representatives do while they are in Washington or Austin or wherever. For example, at least fifteen long-time Republican stalwarts in the Pennsylvania statehouse were given their walking papers by Republican voters in primaries leading up to last November's electoral debacle. They were replaced, by Republican voters, on the Republican ballot in that state by people they had outspent by an average of eight-to-one. There appears to have been a great surprise in this news, at least to this bunch.

Conservative voters actually care.

Continue reading "The Limits of Power" »

February 12, 2007

Leading With Prejudice

Lee Emmerich Jamison

Today on the web we find an article in the Washington Post which attempts to use herd mentality and flattery of an imagined consensus in the public to drive the U.S. out of Iraq.  This would, of course, do exactly what I have predicted for several months the Left has been attempting to do: Abandon Iraq so that millions could die in a carnage completely discrediting America as a world power.

See:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/09/AR2007020901917.html

 

This is part and parcel of what I call leading with prejudice.

Continue reading "Leading With Prejudice" »

February 09, 2007

Of Dinosaurs and other Institutions: part 1

Yesterday I probed again the idea of the foundations of government in once-criminal activities.  That brought to mind how mafias (or today's gangs like M-13) actually compete with governments for primacy in environments where governments fail to effectively maintain good order.  Look carefully and you will see imbedded in that observation an evolutionary process.

This is why I've made a point over the years of playing up evolutionary themes.  The environments in which structures of any kind function favor certain manners of organizing such structures.  This fact leads some structures to perceive threats and to attempt to manipulate their environments.  One way for an organism to do that is to get big.  From the genetic standpoint there is a payoff in stability.  As long as the macro-environment, that larger world over which the organism has no control, remains stable organisms will tend to get bigger.

Bet you can see where this is going...

Continue reading "Of Dinosaurs and other Institutions: part 1" »

February 08, 2007

Government: The REAL Basics

Lee Emmerich Jamison

When we discuss government we think we know what we're talking about.  That is one of the problems of the human mind.  What we really know is a narrowly drawn conception we accept with little examination from our culture.  It is a paradigm, a sort of thinking on rails.

I'm going to toss out a redrawing of the concept of human governance.  Let's see what you think of it.

Continue reading "Government: The REAL Basics" »

February 02, 2007

Up in Plames

Lee Emmerich Jamison

In the summer of 1995 I wrote an article for the Huntsville Item about the then-current state of affairs in what was widely referred to as "PLAMEGATE" in the Washington-New York-Boston center of the known universe.  The issue at hand was who "outed" CIA agent Valerie Plame.  The problem, as I saw it then, was that there so clearly was NO STORY.  Virtually all of Plame's aquaintances knew she worked for the CIA.  It was common knowledge, too, that she has been "under cover" (Her children even famously spouted off as much in the Boston Airport about the time this article was written.)

This is all current today because the only person indicted in the witchunt for a way to put Karl Rove in jail, Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, is now on trial for perjury.  Was he the leaker?  No.  Everybody who does not depend on the network news shows or the front pages of a major liberal newspaper for their news now knows not only that Richard L. Armitage admitted in September that he was the leaker, but we now know that Plamegate special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald KNEW FROM DAY ONE that he was the leaker.  Libby's prosecution turns on whether he really remembered who first told him Valerie Plame was a spy and when or if he really forgot and misreported his first knowlege during the unnecessary investigation.

This blog is not just about whatever pops into my head.  It is about prejudice, bigotry, and how some people use those foibles to empower themselves.  I have stated that bigotry is the bias we can't see in the mirror.  That is an innocent form.  There is a form that is simply unmitigated evil, though, and this series of events is a clear case of a bigoted media mis-, dis-, and un-informing us for the sake of practicing and keeping power for themselves and their friends.

I re-print the article exactly as I first submitted it below.

Continue reading "Up in Plames" »

February 01, 2007

Squatter, Slave, or Property Owner?

Lee Emmerich Jamison

 

Imagine that a man decides to trespass on my property.  He sets up shop though he has no right to be there.  I don't want him to stay, but law enforcement authorities refuse to make him leave.  Some in my family even disagree with me.  After all the man will do chores they want done even if they are not willing to pay a living wage for those chores.  Why should we not take advantage of him if he is willing to be exploited?

Continue reading "Squatter, Slave, or Property Owner?" »

January 31, 2007

Reality

Lee Emmerich Jamison

 

Yesterday I wrote of a world led with prejudice and the danger of being outside the dominant mindset.  This is an important issue because of a simple fact, crucial to understanding how politics and culture are shaped. 

Nobody, well, no human being, lives in the "real" world.

Continue reading "Reality" »

January 30, 2007

The "N.Q."

Lee Emmerich Jamison

When a group is outside of society's philosophical "comfort zone" they need to be very cautious about seeming to have a high N.Q.  What is that?, you may ask.

It's the "Nut Quotient".

Continue reading "The "N.Q."" »

January 27, 2007

Border Bungles Follow-up

Following up on "Border Bungles" from yesterday a reader sent a link to an article on the Ramos and Campean convictions.  It is, to say the least, chilling.  Some people will be put off by the World Net Daily origin, but the fact of the matter is that one can follow up on its sources as easily as those of any other news outlet.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53873

My source for this article is on a campaign to warn people of the danger of a push to establish a North American Union, something like an E.U. common market for North America.  We will be looking further into this and will have more to say about it in the near future.

January 26, 2007

Border Bungles

Lee Emmerich Jamison

 

Re: http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009579

 

In no area of their commentary is the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal so persistently and perniciously wrong than on border issues.  In today's commentary over the furor over the imprisonment of former border agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean the editors pretend all the complaints over the mysterious case simply don't exist.  They speak of the "plain facts" of the case, though transcripts of the trial have not been available even to congressmen.  They wonder not at all of the fact both lawyers for the defense and the defendants themselves are under court order not to discuss aspects of the supposedly public trial.  They fail to mention sealed indictments of witnesses for the prosecution- and that these indictments were not disclosed to the jury.  They fail also to mention other possibly exculpatory evidence withheld from the defense even after conviction, though the evidence may be important to appeals.

 

 

Continue reading "Border Bungles" »